MAYBE 2.207
H-Termination proof of /home/matraf/haskell/eval_FullyBlown_Fast/empty.hs
H-Termination of the given Haskell-Program with start terms could not be shown:
↳ HASKELL
↳ LR
mainModule Main
| ((basicIORun :: IO a -> IOFinished a) :: IO a -> IOFinished a) |
module Main where
Lambda Reductions:
The following Lambda expression
\x→Hugs_Catch (a x) f1 f2 s
is transformed to
hugs_catch0 | a f1 f2 s x | = Hugs_Catch (a x) f1 f2 s |
↳ HASKELL
↳ LR
↳ HASKELL
↳ CR
mainModule Main
| ((basicIORun :: IO a -> IOFinished a) :: IO a -> IOFinished a) |
module Main where
Case Reductions:
The following Case expression
case | primCatchException (catch' m) of |
| Left exn | → f1 exn |
| Right (Hugs_Return a) | → s a |
| Right (Hugs_Error e) | → f2 e |
| Right (Hugs_ForkThread a b) | → Hugs_ForkThread (Hugs_Catch a f1 f2 s) b |
| Right (Hugs_YieldThread a) | → Hugs_YieldThread (Hugs_Catch a f1 f2 s) |
| Right (Hugs_BlockThread a b) | → Hugs_BlockThread (hugs_catch0 a f1 f2 s) b |
| Right r | → r |
is transformed to
hugs_catch1 | f1 s f2 (Left exn) | = f1 exn |
hugs_catch1 | f1 s f2 (Right (Hugs_Return a)) | = s a |
hugs_catch1 | f1 s f2 (Right (Hugs_Error e)) | = f2 e |
hugs_catch1 | f1 s f2 (Right (Hugs_ForkThread a b)) | = Hugs_ForkThread (Hugs_Catch a f1 f2 s) b |
hugs_catch1 | f1 s f2 (Right (Hugs_YieldThread a)) | = Hugs_YieldThread (Hugs_Catch a f1 f2 s) |
hugs_catch1 | f1 s f2 (Right (Hugs_BlockThread a b)) | = Hugs_BlockThread (hugs_catch0 a f1 f2 s) b |
hugs_catch1 | f1 s f2 (Right r) | = r |
↳ HASKELL
↳ LR
↳ HASKELL
↳ CR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
mainModule Main
| ((basicIORun :: IO a -> IOFinished a) :: IO a -> IOFinished a) |
module Main where
Replaced joker patterns by fresh variables and removed binding patterns.
↳ HASKELL
↳ LR
↳ HASKELL
↳ CR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
mainModule Main
| ((basicIORun :: IO a -> IOFinished a) :: IO a -> IOFinished a) |
module Main where
Cond Reductions:
The following Function with conditions
is transformed to
undefined0 | True | = undefined |
undefined1 | | = undefined0 False |
↳ HASKELL
↳ LR
↳ HASKELL
↳ CR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
mainModule Main
| ((basicIORun :: IO a -> IOFinished a) :: IO a -> IOFinished a) |
module Main where
Let/Where Reductions:
The bindings of the following Let/Where expression
hugs_catch1 f1 s f2 (primCatchException (catch' m)) |
where |
catch' | (Hugs_Catch m' f1' f2' s') | = catch' (hugs_catch m' f1' f2' s') |
catch' | x | = x |
|
|
hugs_catch0 | a f1 f2 s x | = Hugs_Catch (a x) f1 f2 s |
|
|
hugs_catch1 | f1 s f2 (Left exn) | = f1 exn |
hugs_catch1 | f1 s f2 (Right (Hugs_Return a)) | = s a |
hugs_catch1 | f1 s f2 (Right (Hugs_Error e)) | = f2 e |
hugs_catch1 | f1 s f2 (Right (Hugs_ForkThread a b)) | = Hugs_ForkThread (Hugs_Catch a f1 f2 s) b |
hugs_catch1 | f1 s f2 (Right (Hugs_YieldThread a)) | = Hugs_YieldThread (Hugs_Catch a f1 f2 s) |
hugs_catch1 | f1 s f2 (Right (Hugs_BlockThread a b)) | = Hugs_BlockThread (hugs_catch0 a f1 f2 s) b |
hugs_catch1 | f1 s f2 (Right r) | = r |
|
are unpacked to the following functions on top level
hugs_catchCatch' | (Hugs_Catch m' f1' f2' s') | = hugs_catchCatch' (hugs_catch m' f1' f2' s') |
hugs_catchCatch' | x | = x |
hugs_catchHugs_catch0 | a f1 f2 s x | = Hugs_Catch (a x) f1 f2 s |
hugs_catchHugs_catch1 | f1 s f2 (Left exn) | = f1 exn |
hugs_catchHugs_catch1 | f1 s f2 (Right (Hugs_Return a)) | = s a |
hugs_catchHugs_catch1 | f1 s f2 (Right (Hugs_Error e)) | = f2 e |
hugs_catchHugs_catch1 | f1 s f2 (Right (Hugs_ForkThread a b)) | = Hugs_ForkThread (Hugs_Catch a f1 f2 s) b |
hugs_catchHugs_catch1 | f1 s f2 (Right (Hugs_YieldThread a)) | = Hugs_YieldThread (Hugs_Catch a f1 f2 s) |
hugs_catchHugs_catch1 | f1 s f2 (Right (Hugs_BlockThread a b)) | = Hugs_BlockThread (hugs_catchHugs_catch0 a f1 f2 s) b |
hugs_catchHugs_catch1 | f1 s f2 (Right r) | = r |
↳ HASKELL
↳ LR
↳ HASKELL
↳ CR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ Narrow
mainModule Main
| (basicIORun :: IO a -> IOFinished a) |
module Main where
Haskell To QDPs
↳ HASKELL
↳ LR
↳ HASKELL
↳ CR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ NonTerminationProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_toObj(wu10, ba) → new_toObj(wu10, ba)
R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We used the non-termination processor [17] to show that the DP problem is infinite.
Found a loop by semiunifying a rule from P directly.
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_toObj(wu10, ba) → new_toObj(wu10, ba)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:none
s = new_toObj(wu10, ba) evaluates to t =new_toObj(wu10, ba)
Thus s starts an infinite chain as s semiunifies with t with the following substitutions:
- Semiunifier: [ ]
- Matcher: [ ]
Rewriting sequence
The DP semiunifies directly so there is only one rewrite step from new_toObj(wu10, ba) to new_toObj(wu10, ba).
↳ HASKELL
↳ LR
↳ HASKELL
↳ CR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ NonTerminationProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_fromObj(wu80, ba) → new_fromObj(wu80, ba)
R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We used the non-termination processor [17] to show that the DP problem is infinite.
Found a loop by semiunifying a rule from P directly.
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_fromObj(wu80, ba) → new_fromObj(wu80, ba)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:none
s = new_fromObj(wu80, ba) evaluates to t =new_fromObj(wu80, ba)
Thus s starts an infinite chain as s semiunifies with t with the following substitutions:
- Semiunifier: [ ]
- Matcher: [ ]
Rewriting sequence
The DP semiunifies directly so there is only one rewrite step from new_fromObj(wu80, ba) to new_fromObj(wu80, ba).
↳ HASKELL
↳ LR
↳ HASKELL
↳ CR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDPSizeChangeProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_psPs(:(wu90, wu91), wu80) → new_psPs(wu91, wu80)
R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By using the subterm criterion [20] together with the size-change analysis [32] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem. From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:
- new_psPs(:(wu90, wu91), wu80) → new_psPs(wu91, wu80)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2
↳ HASKELL
↳ LR
↳ HASKELL
↳ CR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ NonTerminationProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_hugs_catchHugs_catch1(wu81, wu83, wu82, wu80) → new_hugs_catchHugs_catch1(wu81, wu83, wu82, wu80)
R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We used the non-termination processor [17] to show that the DP problem is infinite.
Found a loop by semiunifying a rule from P directly.
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_hugs_catchHugs_catch1(wu81, wu83, wu82, wu80) → new_hugs_catchHugs_catch1(wu81, wu83, wu82, wu80)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:none
s = new_hugs_catchHugs_catch1(wu81, wu83, wu82, wu80) evaluates to t =new_hugs_catchHugs_catch1(wu81, wu83, wu82, wu80)
Thus s starts an infinite chain as s semiunifies with t with the following substitutions:
- Semiunifier: [ ]
- Matcher: [ ]
Rewriting sequence
The DP semiunifies directly so there is only one rewrite step from new_hugs_catchHugs_catch1(wu81, wu83, wu82, wu80) to new_hugs_catchHugs_catch1(wu81, wu83, wu82, wu80).
↳ HASKELL
↳ LR
↳ HASKELL
↳ CR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ UsableRulesProof
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_loop(ba) → new_loop(ba)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
new_hugs_catchHugs_catch10(wu81, wu83, wu82, wu80) → new_hugs_catchHugs_catch10(wu81, wu83, wu82, wu80)
new_hugs_catch(wu80, wu81, wu82, wu83) → new_hugs_catchHugs_catch10(wu81, wu83, wu82, wu80)
new_psPs0([], wu80) → :(wu80, [])
new_psPs0(:(wu90, wu91), wu80) → :(wu90, new_psPs0(wu91, wu80))
The set Q consists of the following terms:
new_psPs0([], x0)
new_hugs_catch(x0, x1, x2, x3)
new_hugs_catchHugs_catch10(x0, x1, x2, x3)
new_psPs0(:(x0, x1), x2)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
As all Q-normal forms are R-normal forms we are in the innermost case. Hence, by the usable rules processor [15] we can delete all non-usable rules [17] from R.
↳ HASKELL
↳ LR
↳ HASKELL
↳ CR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ UsableRulesProof
↳ QDP
↳ QReductionProof
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_loop(ba) → new_loop(ba)
R is empty.
The set Q consists of the following terms:
new_psPs0([], x0)
new_hugs_catch(x0, x1, x2, x3)
new_hugs_catchHugs_catch10(x0, x1, x2, x3)
new_psPs0(:(x0, x1), x2)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We deleted the following terms from Q as each root-symbol of these terms does neither occur in P nor in R.
new_psPs0([], x0)
new_hugs_catch(x0, x1, x2, x3)
new_hugs_catchHugs_catch10(x0, x1, x2, x3)
new_psPs0(:(x0, x1), x2)
↳ HASKELL
↳ LR
↳ HASKELL
↳ CR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ UsableRulesProof
↳ QDP
↳ QReductionProof
↳ QDP
↳ NonTerminationProof
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_loop(ba) → new_loop(ba)
R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We used the non-termination processor [17] to show that the DP problem is infinite.
Found a loop by semiunifying a rule from P directly.
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_loop(ba) → new_loop(ba)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:none
s = new_loop(ba) evaluates to t =new_loop(ba)
Thus s starts an infinite chain as s semiunifies with t with the following substitutions:
- Semiunifier: [ ]
- Matcher: [ ]
Rewriting sequence
The DP semiunifies directly so there is only one rewrite step from new_loop(ba) to new_loop(ba).
↳ HASKELL
↳ LR
↳ HASKELL
↳ CR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_loop0(Hugs_Catch(wu80, wu81, wu82, wu83), wu9, ba) → new_loop0(new_hugs_catch(wu80, wu81, wu82, wu83), wu9, ba)
new_loop0(Hugs_ForkThread(wu80, wu81), wu9, ba) → new_loop0(wu80, :(wu81, wu9), ba)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
new_hugs_catchHugs_catch10(wu81, wu83, wu82, wu80) → new_hugs_catchHugs_catch10(wu81, wu83, wu82, wu80)
new_hugs_catch(wu80, wu81, wu82, wu83) → new_hugs_catchHugs_catch10(wu81, wu83, wu82, wu80)
The set Q consists of the following terms:
new_hugs_catch(x0, x1, x2, x3)
new_hugs_catchHugs_catch10(x0, x1, x2, x3)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 1 SCC with 1 less node.
↳ HASKELL
↳ LR
↳ HASKELL
↳ CR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ QDP
↳ UsableRulesProof
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_loop0(Hugs_ForkThread(wu80, wu81), wu9, ba) → new_loop0(wu80, :(wu81, wu9), ba)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
new_hugs_catchHugs_catch10(wu81, wu83, wu82, wu80) → new_hugs_catchHugs_catch10(wu81, wu83, wu82, wu80)
new_hugs_catch(wu80, wu81, wu82, wu83) → new_hugs_catchHugs_catch10(wu81, wu83, wu82, wu80)
The set Q consists of the following terms:
new_hugs_catch(x0, x1, x2, x3)
new_hugs_catchHugs_catch10(x0, x1, x2, x3)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
As all Q-normal forms are R-normal forms we are in the innermost case. Hence, by the usable rules processor [15] we can delete all non-usable rules [17] from R.
↳ HASKELL
↳ LR
↳ HASKELL
↳ CR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ QDP
↳ UsableRulesProof
↳ QDP
↳ QReductionProof
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_loop0(Hugs_ForkThread(wu80, wu81), wu9, ba) → new_loop0(wu80, :(wu81, wu9), ba)
R is empty.
The set Q consists of the following terms:
new_hugs_catch(x0, x1, x2, x3)
new_hugs_catchHugs_catch10(x0, x1, x2, x3)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We deleted the following terms from Q as each root-symbol of these terms does neither occur in P nor in R.
new_hugs_catch(x0, x1, x2, x3)
new_hugs_catchHugs_catch10(x0, x1, x2, x3)
↳ HASKELL
↳ LR
↳ HASKELL
↳ CR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ QDP
↳ UsableRulesProof
↳ QDP
↳ QReductionProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDPSizeChangeProof
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_loop0(Hugs_ForkThread(wu80, wu81), wu9, ba) → new_loop0(wu80, :(wu81, wu9), ba)
R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By using the subterm criterion [20] together with the size-change analysis [32] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem. From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:
- new_loop0(Hugs_ForkThread(wu80, wu81), wu9, ba) → new_loop0(wu80, :(wu81, wu9), ba)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 3 >= 3
Haskell To QDPs